Skip to content

Dance of Death

Jess Olivieri and Hayley Forward and the Parachutes for Ladies

PACT Theatre
date: Monday 8 March 2010
facilitator: Kathryn Gray
participants: Ashley Dyer, Susan Gibb, Anne Kay, Jess Olivieri, Sarah Rodigari, Emma White.

Dance of Death was a participatory performance presented as part of the Tiny Stadiums Festival in Erskinville, 6-7 March 2010. We staged this Free Association conversation the following evening in the nearby PACT Theatre, and there were interesting challenges involved. As the work was physically absent (present solely in our recollections) and was repeated within the public space and with different participants each time, for this feedback we were remembering different iterations of the work. In Anne’s case, she had missed the performances altogether, and recreated the artwork alone in the dark theatre space prior to the discussion.

The discussion began with recollecting our individual and collective experiences of taking part in this work.

Eg. Kathy:
On a hot Saturday afternoon I started with my walk from Newtown along Erskinville Road to approach the festival. Located Jess facilitating the Dance of Death in front of the Town Hall. She stood behind a desk where you signed away the disclaimer, gave your ID to collect your audio guide, and instructed you to wait on one of the plastic chairs set up in rows facing each other on the footpath. When I arrived there was a performance session in process, so I followed these participants a little way to observe them moving and dancing down the road. And when it was my turn I sat down amongst a small group of people, some I knew well, some sort-of and others not at all. I recalled one of the first instructions was to look ahead at and smile at each other. It was a warm introduction to the process, and countered nicely the modest technical frustrations involved in synchronising a collection of different people and their audio guides. We were first taken through a number of instructions, for breathing, stretching out our bodies in the public space, shaking off our worries, and setting off – safely – down Erskineville road together.

The work is ostensibly instructions, soothingly spoken against an ambient music background, delivered to each participant via large black headphones and a standard-issue mp3 player. These audio instructions guide your participatory experience for about 20 minutes. Dance of Death sends you down Erskineville Road and across side-streets, directs you to walk confidently and skip, to crouch into a circle with your group and perform basic dance/yoga sequences together. The work builds in intensity as it draws to conclusion. The audio track becomes intense, driving you dancing together around in circles at the place you started. It ends with applause – an oblique instruction and self-reflexive critique of your role within the Dance of Death.

Eg. Anne:
I hadn’t seen anything of the performances of Dance of Death, so as a way of being able to participate in a discussion of the work, I came early to the feedback session at PACT Theatre and was given an MP3 player and headphones to enact the work in this location. It was a strange experience, not only because of being displaced physically from the location references to Erskineville, but also because I was doing the actions on my own and off to one side from other people who were standing around chatting. I didn’t know most of the people and found myself worrying what they might be thinking of me prancing about in the corner of the space. I assumed that I looked quite foolish, but despite this, I began to enjoy following the simple instructions, especially the skipping and making shapes with my arms. It was fun and reminded me of being a kid and how using your body in this way as an adult is not the norm. It had some of the exuberant qualities of dancing in front of your mirror in your bedroom as a teenager.

Back to the group discussion:
We spent some time sharing our recollections of carrying out the tasks, how we worked together or out of sync, how our movements improved with time as we progressed up the street. We often spoke of our response to ‘performing’ in a group in public space. Most people reported noticing their own internal dialogue about what other people on the street might think, but for the most part their consciousness was taken up with concentrating on performing the actions, and trying to get in sync with the other participants. We each noticed different nuances of the public context. Sarah pointed out trepidations in getting close to the hedge and the ground beneath which was not so nice and clean, but Kathy remembered being glad of  the shade and the proximity to nature. Ashley described the resonance of the dance in relation to the passers by on the street, something which was different for all of us.

Another feature of the work that received a lot of discussion was instructional voiceover. We particularly noted the phrasing, dulcet tones and gentle muzak background. What we were asked to think and do was reminiscent of instructional recordings for teaching yoga, meditation or ‘new age’ practices. The irony and sincerity of this approach generated debate. We also identified cadences in the work, in which we were alternately encouraged to relax and to action; chided for our failures to help others and affirmed that “I believe in you”; and stirred to aerobic/shamanistic movement. We agreed there was considerable vulnerability involved in this work, as a solo and collective performance experience in the public space. However the headphones and audio track provided some relief/protection for participants and encouraged us to really engage with their imaginary journey.

We considered our complicity within the work following instructions. Dance of Death required you to cooperate, and to swiftly abandon normal public behaviour to become part of the performative spectacle. The instructions directed your actions and tell you how to think and feel. Early in the work you are led into a small park to stand face-to-face with a hedge. You are there temporarily isolated from your group of participants to reflect alone with your shortcomings, coaxed through an implausible string of self-help metaphors and affirmations, to find yourself enacting tears running down your cheeks to the soil.

Concluding the feedback, Jess talked of some of her intentions working with Hayley and the Parachutes. They were interested in exploring different authoritative voices and play, what we could be impelled to do within power-structures and civic spaces. Their instructions were kindly delivered to reassure and affirm, yet test limits of our comfortable participation. Behind this work, they have been researching group behaviour and the confusion of public responsibility. The audio track, instructional text and the public site-specific performances were also considered part of a narrative journey which was enabled and reiterated by each participant and passer-by. As such, Dance of Death continues Jess and Hayley’s investigation of the territorialisation of spaces and the responsibilities of our actions there.

http://www.parachutesforladies.com/

The Machine Stops - Jai McKenzie

The Machine Stops

Jai McKenzie

MOP
date: Saturday, November 14, 2009
facilitator: Anne Kay
participants: Biljana Jancic, Camille Serisier, Amanda Williams, Tori Lawson, Jai Mckenzie


The conversation for The Machine stops, a media installation by Jai Mckenzie, began by the discussion of whether to first read the Room Sheet which presented a quote from a Buckminster Fuller telegram to Isamu Noguchi from 1936. As the artist, Jai requested that we begin in this way because the text was a key part of the work.

The quoted text read:

EINSTEINS FORMULA DETERMINATION INDIVIDUAL SPECIFICS RELATIVITY READS QUOTE ENERGY EQUALS MASS TIMES THE SPEED OF LIGHT SQUARED UNQUOTE SPEED OF LIGHT IDENTICAL SPEED ALL RADIATION COSMIC GAMMA X ULTRA VIOLET INFRA RED RAYS ETCETERA ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY SIX THOUSAND MILES PER SECOND WHICH SQUARED IS TOP OR PERFECT SPEED GIVING SCIENCE A FINITE VALUE FOR BASIC FACTOR IN MOTION UNIVERSE STOP SPEED OF RADIANT ENERGY BEING DIRECTIONAL OUTWARD ALL DIRECTIONS EXPANDING WAVE SURFACE DIAMETRIC POLAR SPEED AWAY FROM SELF IS TWICE SPEED IN ONE DIRECTION AND SPEED OF VOLUME INCREASE IS SQUARE OF SPEED IN ONE DIRECTION APPROXIMATLEY THIRTY FIVE BILLION VOLUMETRIC MILES PER SECOND STOP FORMULA IS WRITTEN QUOTE LETTER E FOLLOWED BY EQUATION MARK FOLLOWED BY LETTER M FOLLOWED BY LETTER C FOLLOWED CLOSELY BY ELEVATED SMALL FIGURE TWO SYMBOL OF SQUARING UNQUOTE ONLY VARIABLE IN FORMULA IS SPECIFIC MASS SPEED IS A UNIT OF RATE WHICH IS INTEGRATED RATIO OF BOTH TIME AND SPACE AND NO GREATER RATE OF SPEED THAN THAT PROVIDED BY ITS CAUSE WHICH IS PURE ENERGY LATENT OR RADIANT IS ATTAINABLE STOP THE FORMULA THEREFORE PROVIDES A UNIT AND A RATE OF PERFECTION TO WHICH THE RELATIVE IMPERFECTION OR INEFFICIENCY OF ENERGY RELEASE IN RADIANT OR CONFINED DIRECTION OF ALL TEMPORAL SPACE PHENOMENA MAY BE COMPARED BY ACTUAL CALCULATION STOP SIGNIFICANCE STOP SPECIFIC QUALITY OF ANIMATES IS CONTROL WILLFUL OR OTHERWISE OF RATE AND DIRECTION ENERGY RELEASE AND APPLICATION NOT ONLY OF SELF MECHANISM BUT OF FROM SELF MACHINE DIVIDED MECHANISMS AND RELATIVITY OF ALL ANIMATES AND INANIMATES IS POTENTIAL OF ESTABLISHMENT THROUGH EINSTEIN FORMULA

BUCKY

The format of the Telegram (CAPITALISATION ABSENCE OF GRAMMAR SENTENCE STRUCTURE OR PUNCTUATION AND THE INCLUSION OF THE WORD STOP AT REGULAR INTERVALS) not to mention the text’s content which included discussion of Einstein’s complex formula E=MC2, made for extraordinarily difficult reading, for this reader at least. There was a sense of having one’s thinking twisted multidimensionally and a jamming of the signal or meaning.

I did love though, that ‘Bucky’ was so excited about these ideas (even three decades after they were written) that he must urgently communicate them to another using the most rapid communication possible at that time, the telegram. A communication medium more commonly associated with urgent good or bad news.

The telegram seemed to encapsulate an entirely different way of perceiving and thinking about the world, which I enjoyed a glimpse of. Perhaps this is the experience non-artists have sometimes of viewing certain sorts of artworks.

One of our early points of discussion involved an attempt as a group to make sense of the meaning of the telegram text. We struggled with this—while we all recognised Einstein’s now famous theorem E=MC2, for most of us our understanding of it’s meaning and implications were very sketchy, as was our knowledge of who Buckminster Fuller was. It struck me that there are many complex ideas from other disciplines that I merely recognise rather than fully understand. It was a topic that was usefully tackled as a group, rather than on one’s own—a bit like dealing with complex art or philosophical theories in a tutorial setting—we were able to put together a collection of recollections and information that ranged across 1960s architecture and utopianism. At the same time as we brought together what we knew, even more interesting was to discover how much that we thought we were familiar with was in fact unclear to us—simple things like the workings of the telegraph.

The breadth of the discussion that followed was remarkable, with threads from the links the work had to 20th century geometric abstraction, minimalism, structural film, the narrative of process works, the history of technologies.

The reductive content of the work seemed to provide enormous room for allusions and connections to materialise for the particants. I have to say it was one of the most stimulating conversations I had all year.

Knife Edge - Rachel Scott


Knife Edge: 3 Exhibitions, 12 Days

Rachel Scott

Firstdraft gallery 3
date: Thursday 15 October 2009
facilitator: Kathryn Gray
participants: Carla Cescon, Will French, Agatha Gothe-Snape, Michaela Gleave, Rachel Scott

On the day we met at the Knife Edge, it was in its final stage. The room-sheet mapped out the three exhibitions, the last being ‘14.10.09-17.10.09: Installation/Action’. It was like a battlefield. Rachel had painted most of the two gallery walls in big gestural stripes vs expressionist strokes, alternating between flat red and pearlescent pink. Underneath this, the clean gallery walls glowed a remarkable white. The edges of the wall-painting were sharply defined. Opposite, in front of the windows was a clear plastic dropsheet supported by a ladder and covered with the same lurid paint. Under the ladder was a piece of glass strapped up with black electrical tape. A roll of the same black tape nestled on the edge of the floor, underneath two nails almost invisible in the pink wall. A white envelope, sealed by a blob of pink and mounted in a white frame, hung low beside the entrance to the gallery. The gallery space was pristine and orderly, despite the emotive walls and abandoned construction materials. Michaela led this observation of the installation, noting these gestures and materials in detail.

We then went backwards to recollect the first exhibition, ‘30.9.09-3.10.09: Painting’. Rachel had then presented seven modestly sized abstract expressionist paintings. Each was titled Painting and numbered from one to seven. They were painted in acrylic on canvas, in muted hues and big brushstrokes, and hung high on the two gallery walls opposing the windows.

Next we considered the second exhibition, ‘7.10.09-10.10.09: Video’. On the floor under the windows, were two videos on flat screens. The screens sat on DVD players with their cords splayed out and mimicking the cracks in the flooring, again immaculately clean. Michaela described each video from recollection. The first, a static shot of a dim room with a candle, bed and the restless action of Rachel tossing and turning under the covers, dressed in a black negligee. The second video was an interior static shot looking over a revolving cityscape at dawn. Both videos screened alternately in black and white and in colour, with rollicking musical soundtracks available through headphones.  The paintings had been removed but haunted the space with black tape over their holes in the walls. 

Starting with the suspense of the Knife Edge title, the project is filmic in its sequences and drama. Carla described the first step with paintings like “windows into some odd avenue of expression” which shift into video dramas. The final stage then “goes into anarchy… this is the total fucked-up edge of you, as the artist. The expression and the analysis of the artist’s reality.” Agatha noted that the first artwork encountered was Fallen, composed of the dropsheet and ladder, and the dramatic residue of hubris in this sculpture. So staged as a series of installations, we considered the recurrences and discontinuities between the paint and tape, framing and expression, and Rachel’s operation in time and space.

The exhibition project involved considerable affect. There was intimacy throughout, with the framed sealed envelope, sleepless Rachel in a messed-up bed, the modest paintings to start with and the visceral wall-paint to finish inside of. In this last exhibition the lurid walls, titled Pretty (Crazy) Monochrome, were a very specific pink and referred to a particular femininity. Carla related the this pink gestural “implosion” to women’s capacity for “introspective torture.” This was a violent space, like being “inside Rachel’s guts.” 

Also palpable was the deliberation of influences. The various paintings spoke to the modernist History of Painting. The videos were named like love-song dedications, for Francis and for Lazlo. There were familiar formal constraints, of painting on canvas and on walls, the embodied gestures possible with stripes and expressionism, the presentation of video and sound.

The question was asked, “What’s bad painting?” We considered this problem. We wondered why we did not really discuss painting.

But it was clear there was more behind the three scenes. We were attentive to the massive effort and deliberation in cleaning and transforming the gallery space over duration of the project. So cleaning the gallery floors and walls was like paying homage or servicing the space, drawing analogies to gender roles and theatrical conventions. There was a strong sense of potential as well as futility in staging these three distinct exhibitions, particularly in the Firstdraft gallery space soon to be demolished. Will described the show in terms of decisions: of aesthetics, intention, selecting from an arsenal of work and then generating art in the space. Rachel explained how she contended with formal decisions vs intuitive and performative processes in the moment, in this space, and over time.

Notes on ‘Imprint’

 

Framing, framing of frames, within frames and the extended framing and reframing that must necessarily follow in a critical process which is the central to the practices associated with ‘Imprint’, an exhibition curated by Anneke Jaspers as Artspace, Sydney. The questioning of the way art frames the world and also the frames of art is important for the interrogation of the way past actions come to dwell in the present, which is important for evaluating the effects that legacy and memory have in shaping culture. Reflexivity on the multiple layers of framing experience often takes form of re-framing and re-representation, however when these re-creations are placed in a spatial context they allow for new histories to occur and perhaps create opportunity for new relations and mythologies to develop. After all, what is mythology if not a narrative for the creation and extension of collective identity or culture. There is a calculated diversity in the different approaches brought together in the exhibition which features: Kathryn Gray, Bianca Hester, Anne Kay and Teaching and Learning Cinema (Lucas Ihlein and Louise Curham). The works all contemplate the palimpsests of past actions and their place and meaning within the creative process.

 

(Continued)

‘Imprint’ Kathryn Gray, Bianca Hester, Anne Kay, Teaching and Learning Cinema, curated by Anneke Jaspers


IMPRINT

Artspace, Sydney

Curated by Anneke Jaspers

Featuring: Kathryn Gray, Bianca Hester, Anne Kay and Teaching and Learning Cinema (Lucas Ihlein and Louise Curham).

Date: 1 August 2009

Facilitator: Biljana Jancic

Participants: Agatha Goethe-Snape, Katherine Gray, Anneke Jaspers, Kylie Johnson, Anne Kay, Lisa Kelly, Clare Lewis

Facilitator’s Notes:

(Continued)

To Make a Work of Timeless Art: MCA Primavera Acquisitions, curated by Isabel Finch & Clare Lewis

To Make a Work of Timeless Art: MCA Primavera Acquisitions
Curated by Isabel Finch & Clare Lewis

Museum of Contemporary Art
date: Thursday 12th March 2009
facilitator: Anneke Jaspers
participants: Anneke Jaspers, Michaela Gleave, Kathy Gray, Lisa Kelly, Jo Daniell, Joel Mu, Clare Lewis, Isabel Finch.

Listen to audio excerpts Part A and Part B.
(Continued)

Notes on a state of conversation

thisiscurating_opening_may 08
-image of THISISCURATING 1-40 opening courtesy of Firstdraft

Notes on a state of conversation.

Lisa Kelly

essay commissioned and originally published
Runway
Issue 11: Conversation
edited by Anneke Jaspers
Winter 2008

runway 11 cover_winter 08

HOW DO WE COMMUNICATE?
On the short term, phones and email can be used
to arrange meetings. But they often fail to provide
the impetus that actually brings people in
dialogue with one another. They act as alibis for
the commitment that may or may not be sufficiently
developed between people. Given the event-led
cultural economy we live in today, communication
after the fact proves to be the weakest link in
our development. One might envisage setting up
an AGENCY FOR AFTERMATH COMMUNICATIONS in
art practice… Face to face contact is precious.

- Clementine Deliss (1)

Over a recent three-week period I was immersed in an incidental but noticeable sequence of visual arts dialogue events and encounters. These seem useful material for a part round-up, part temperature check on how occasions to talk to each other – as artists, audiences, people, peers, and communities – are being generated out of local practices, projects and spaces. On the varying qualities of these occasions, differing approaches to facilitation, and the meaningful potential and effects of thoughtful discursive practice. (Continued)

‘The Role-System’, Sari TM Kivinen

Location: MOP

Date: 6pm, 4th October 2008

Facilitator: Kathryn Gray

Participants: Mark Shorter, Michaela Gleave, Biljana Jancic, Lisa Kelly

This conversation took place around ‘The Role-System’, by which Sari TM Kivinen positioned her various performative roles within a gallery project.

Michaela led the observation of the works installed in the space, noting structures, decorations and artifacts, with video, photographic and puppet-like representations. Lisa recounted Kivinen’s opening night performance. Biljana read out the genealogy of the six roles in the system: fictional siblings Jessilina, Carolina and Stirella, the functional Manager and Therapist, and Kivinen herself. (Continued)

Spring Retreat

otford_garie walk 
burning palms

The Free Association
Spring Retreat
Garie Beach, The Royal National Park
dates: Thursday 6th - Saturday 8th November 2008
facilitator: Anneke Jaspers
participants: Anneke Jaspers, Lisa Kelly, Filipa Raposo, Michaela Gleave, Madeleine Donovan, Emma White, Camille Serisier, Kathy Gray, Jessica Olivieri, Hayley Forward.

‘Milk’ Helen Pynor

discussion location: Dominik Mersch Gallery, 2 Danks St, Waterloo
www.dominikmerschgallery.com has a media release and more information about the works
date: 4pm, 1st November 2008
facilitator: Anne Kay
participants: Melissa Laing, (guest artist), Lisa Kelly, Anne Kay, Michaela Gleave, Camille Serisier, Helen Pynor.
Present in the gallery but not engaging in the discussion: Dominik Mersch and the normal flow of Saturday gallery visitors.

The feedback for Helen Pynor’s exhibition Milk, was the first Free Association feedback session to focus on an exhibition at a commercial gallery space. Thank you to Dominik Mersch for having the feedback in the gallery and to Helen for inviting us to come and speak about her work. (Continued)